Chelsea goes against third straight
After the 3-0 loss against Roma in the last Champions League round, Chelsea has been on track – first, a fierce 1-0 win at home against Manchester United, a victory followed by a 4-0 overcoming West Bromwich to travel. The game has looked really good and you have definitely shown nice trends in the offensive. Now a move away against Qarabagh is in the fifth round of the Champions League group game, and it feels like the English are making the process short with the team from Azerbaijan. Guests park on a second place in the group, with four points down to Atletico Madrid and one point up to Rome. Three points are the only ones on the map here, especially given that Rome is visiting a desperate Atletico on Wednesday night. The premiere in the group is quite up to grabs and this does not teach Chelsea to sump.
Qarabagh comes from two straight crossing matches against Spanish Atletico Madrid, a company that obviously should not be underestimated, but at the same time, I have to point out that Atletico underperforms something strongly. The Spaniards have had major problems with the goalkeeper in the last few weeks, one could say that Chelsea has a significantly higher capacity in the offensive. The English people definitely have more keys to use to defeat the home team’s defensive, something we saw in the first meeting of the team between Chelsea picking an odious 6-0 victory. A result in that style is probably a little too much demanded, but at the same time, it is more than justified to expect three comfortable points, especially considering that Chelsea has shown really nice form trends since the loss of Roma.
Qarabagh is not enough
Qarabagh comes from two straight crosses at Atletico Madrid. It’s a business I definitely respect, but that’s nothing that makes me draw any big conclusions. Qarabagh will definitely not advance from the group, and I do not see how to resist a formidable Chelsea here. In the first meeting, you went on a 6-0 loss, a result that looked like the match image was in the rough. Then it will be said that Chelsea patterned a right so B-stressed starting line, which still puts it all in perspective.
In addition to double crossing a powerful under-performing Atletico Madrid, Qarabagh has not harvested any successes in the group play. Only two goals forward and the result line 0-2-2. It is, if anything, beyond the expectation of the resistance in the group. I would like to claim that Qarabagh is actually weaker than the results show, and then the results are nothing to hang in the grain. As I say, I respect the team’s double crossing at Atletico Madrid, but I do not see how to resist a formidable Chelsea with Morata, Fabregas and Hazard in big form. Does the large-scale difference between the layers matter?
